<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google is trying to also be .Mac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Starr.com - Nick Starr dot com &#187; Google Picasa Web Album</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/#comment-16870</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Starr.com - Nick Starr dot com &#187; Google Picasa Web Album</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/#comment-16870</guid>
		<description>[...] This seems like yet another way that Google is not only trying to get one over on Yahoo!, but also another attempt to become the new .Mac.  Technorati Tags: digital photo, flickr, flickr killer, google, google picasa, photo, photos, picasa, picasa web album [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This seems like yet another way that Google is not only trying to get one over on Yahoo!, but also another attempt to become the new .Mac.  Technorati Tags: digital photo, flickr, flickr killer, google, google picasa, photo, photos, picasa, picasa web album [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/#comment-16208</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 18:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/#comment-16208</guid>
		<description>"..there’s no reason for a .Mac user to switch to Google".
I have to disagree with Chris' comment there.  Mac users have every reason to consider Google's services. I no longer subscribe to .mac as I found it to costly for my needs, so now have Gmail which is far superior to Apple's webmail service, Google calender from which I can manage on any browser - anywhere, plus I can allow iCal to subsctibe to it, gDisk (an open source app much like iDisk) for backing up my files to my Gmail account, Blogger and now Google Browser Sync. All this for free, looks like a mighty good reason not to have to pay £70 a year to Apple for the extra spit and polish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;..there’s no reason for a .Mac user to switch to Google&#8221;.<br />
I have to disagree with Chris&#8217; comment there.  Mac users have every reason to consider Google&#8217;s services. I no longer subscribe to .mac as I found it to costly for my needs, so now have Gmail which is far superior to Apple&#8217;s webmail service, Google calender from which I can manage on any browser - anywhere, plus I can allow iCal to subsctibe to it, gDisk (an open source app much like iDisk) for backing up my files to my Gmail account, Blogger and now Google Browser Sync. All this for free, looks like a mighty good reason not to have to pay £70 a year to Apple for the extra spit and polish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Marveloso</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/#comment-16183</link>
		<dc:creator>El Marveloso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 17:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/#comment-16183</guid>
		<description>You forgot about Google Calendar. Much better than iCal. iCal's web calendar should be what Google offers. Check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot about Google Calendar. Much better than iCal. iCal&#8217;s web calendar should be what Google offers. Check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomB</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/#comment-16168</link>
		<dc:creator>TomB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/#comment-16168</guid>
		<description>I dropped .mac because I found WebDAV to be glacial. If GDisk does standard sFTP, this would be a winner in my book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dropped .mac because I found WebDAV to be glacial. If GDisk does standard sFTP, this would be a winner in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/#comment-16165</link>
		<dc:creator>MB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/#comment-16165</guid>
		<description>Interesting - I would pay pretty well to whoever wins this one! I use .Mac pretty heavily: email, blog, video/audio, photos, storage, backup, sync, etc. I'd be interested in seeing if Google could deliver the same services. The price is good for me - I'd pay up to $200 a year for decent service. I'm just looking for the best feature set.. more storage, more services, etc.

-MB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting - I would pay pretty well to whoever wins this one! I use .Mac pretty heavily: email, blog, video/audio, photos, storage, backup, sync, etc. I&#8217;d be interested in seeing if Google could deliver the same services. The price is good for me - I&#8217;d pay up to $200 a year for decent service. I&#8217;m just looking for the best feature set.. more storage, more services, etc.</p>
<p>-MB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/#comment-16135</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 14:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/#comment-16135</guid>
		<description>"Watch out Microsoft and Apple, Google is coming for you." 

Uh, maybe Google will be able to compete in some applications, but Apple's .Mac is a small piece of the Apple machine. Subscriptions are doing well, it works really well, and there's no reason for a .Mac user to switch to Google. So, it's no big deal. Apple just has to keep adding on to .Mac, and there won't be anything to worry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Watch out Microsoft and Apple, Google is coming for you.&#8221; </p>
<p>Uh, maybe Google will be able to compete in some applications, but Apple&#8217;s .Mac is a small piece of the Apple machine. Subscriptions are doing well, it works really well, and there&#8217;s no reason for a .Mac user to switch to Google. So, it&#8217;s no big deal. Apple just has to keep adding on to .Mac, and there won&#8217;t be anything to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawk Wings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Google the new .Mac?</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/#comment-16123</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawk Wings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Google the new .Mac?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/06/08/google-is-trying-to-also-be-mac/#comment-16123</guid>
		<description>[...] Nick Starr points out  that while many people know Google is the new Microsoft Office, few stop to think how Google is also the new .Mac. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nick Starr points out  that while many people know Google is the new Microsoft Office, few stop to think how Google is also the new .Mac. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
