<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oscar-gate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don Meaker</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1598</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Meaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1598</guid>
		<description>Actually, the best picture was the one that made the most money. Motion Picture making is a business, and it is about making money for its investors.

Last year, the best picture, by far, was Passion of the Christ. The best picture that actually got an award this year was "Wallace and Gromit" The best picture that didn't get an award was "Narnia".

Someday Hollywierd will realize that we go to pictures to be entertained, not educated, corrupted, disgusted, or offended. When that happens, investors in movies will make a ton of cash, and actor's remuneration for their undoubted talents will greatly increase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the best picture was the one that made the most money. Motion Picture making is a business, and it is about making money for its investors.</p>
<p>Last year, the best picture, by far, was Passion of the Christ. The best picture that actually got an award this year was &#8220;Wallace and Gromit&#8221; The best picture that didn&#8217;t get an award was &#8220;Narnia&#8221;.</p>
<p>Someday Hollywierd will realize that we go to pictures to be entertained, not educated, corrupted, disgusted, or offended. When that happens, investors in movies will make a ton of cash, and actor&#8217;s remuneration for their undoubted talents will greatly increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1547</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1547</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, this seems quite familiar to something that happened in 2000. But that was much worse. An cheating president! Brokeback should have won though. Stupid right-wingers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, this seems quite familiar to something that happened in 2000. But that was much worse. An cheating president! Brokeback should have won though. Stupid right-wingers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wholesomedick</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>wholesomedick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 09:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>I feel like I've been raped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like I&#8217;ve been raped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>People</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>I really hope you aren't taking this ballot seriously...a few posts above does say it is a photoshop...come on people.  On to the topic of awards, they are all subjective.  Everyone can have their own Best Picture.  To make a statement that Brokeback touched every person that saw it is false.  I know 6 people that saw it, 4 said it was a waste of their money, 2 enjoyed it.  

Anyway, the point is, pick your own best picture and forget about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope you aren&#8217;t taking this ballot seriously&#8230;a few posts above does say it is a photoshop&#8230;come on people.  On to the topic of awards, they are all subjective.  Everyone can have their own Best Picture.  To make a statement that Brokeback touched every person that saw it is false.  I know 6 people that saw it, 4 said it was a waste of their money, 2 enjoyed it.  </p>
<p>Anyway, the point is, pick your own best picture and forget about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Dux</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1472</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Dux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1472</guid>
		<description>Movies and television shows about racism are a dime a dozen.  Brokeback's content is rare indeed, and in telling such a story, touched everyone who saw it.  It's not only a very important movie to see, but an excellent one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Movies and television shows about racism are a dime a dozen.  Brokeback&#8217;s content is rare indeed, and in telling such a story, touched everyone who saw it.  It&#8217;s not only a very important movie to see, but an excellent one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie young</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1471</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 21:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1471</guid>
		<description>oh come on already.  I have accept the defeat with grace and dignity.  Just as Annie Proulx has.  :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh come on already.  I have accept the defeat with grace and dignity.  Just as Annie Proulx has.  <img src='http://www.nickstarr.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iris</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1465</link>
		<dc:creator>iris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 15:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1465</guid>
		<description>To "Hi there".

What do you mean Crash is about REAL problems?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To &#8220;Hi there&#8221;.</p>
<p>What do you mean Crash is about REAL problems?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iris</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1463</link>
		<dc:creator>iris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 15:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1463</guid>
		<description>Simple Explanation...

Voters in the Oscars have: 

BAD TASTE!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple Explanation&#8230;</p>
<p>Voters in the Oscars have: </p>
<p>BAD TASTE!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heterophobic</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1462</link>
		<dc:creator>heterophobic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 15:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1462</guid>
		<description>The only logical explanation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only logical explanation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergio</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1453</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1453</guid>
		<description>how confusing is it, you got freaking arrows pointing to the damn hole. you would have to be an idiot to vote for the wrong movie. no one's rushing you, there's no time limit. get the hell out of here with that excuse. people are careful to get the right hole when they can only do it once. if you can't punch the right whole, maybe you shouldn't be allowed to vote. im not here to defend Crash, just my two cents on stupid excuses</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how confusing is it, you got freaking arrows pointing to the damn hole. you would have to be an idiot to vote for the wrong movie. no one&#8217;s rushing you, there&#8217;s no time limit. get the hell out of here with that excuse. people are careful to get the right hole when they can only do it once. if you can&#8217;t punch the right whole, maybe you shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to vote. im not here to defend Crash, just my two cents on stupid excuses</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2006-03-11 at Musings of a Chicagoan</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1450</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2006-03-11 at Musings of a Chicagoan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 05:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1450</guid>
		<description>[...] The real reason that &#8220;Brokeback Mountain&#8221; didn&#8217;t win. (tags: images funny politics movies) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The real reason that &#8220;Brokeback Mountain&#8221; didn&#8217;t win. (tags: images funny politics movies) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1446</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 00:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1446</guid>
		<description>I was very dissapointed that Brokeback Mountain didn't win and know the academy will regret their decision in the very near future.  I mean, this is crazy!  Send this ballot to the academy and ask if confusion was apart of the equation.  Infact, I thought the same thing, like when Gore almost beat Bush, but Bush fortunately won.  Send this to them, and see what they think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very dissapointed that Brokeback Mountain didn&#8217;t win and know the academy will regret their decision in the very near future.  I mean, this is crazy!  Send this ballot to the academy and ask if confusion was apart of the equation.  Infact, I thought the same thing, like when Gore almost beat Bush, but Bush fortunately won.  Send this to them, and see what they think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hi there</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>Hi there</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>Oh shut up already CRASH was the best movie in a while and it's so much better than the Mountain movie. Crash was about REAL problems. alright so shut up, it was well deserved</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh shut up already CRASH was the best movie in a while and it&#8217;s so much better than the Mountain movie. Crash was about REAL problems. alright so shut up, it was well deserved</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tro</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1439</link>
		<dc:creator>Tro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1439</guid>
		<description>It's "would've" (contraction of would have) not "would of".  Sorry... pet peeve!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s &#8220;would&#8217;ve&#8221; (contraction of would have) not &#8220;would of&#8221;.  Sorry&#8230; pet peeve!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1434</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1434</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BTW...from Defamer&lt;/strong&gt;

[*If we don't explicitly mention that this is someone's Photoshop project and not the actual ballot, we're going to get e-mail telling us that we're stupid for believing in a fake ballot, so there you have it: The above mock-up is not to be used for actual Oscar voting.] 

http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/oscars/the-brokeback-butterfly-ballot-159169.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BTW&#8230;from Defamer</strong></p>
<p>[*If we don't explicitly mention that this is someone's Photoshop project and not the actual ballot, we're going to get e-mail telling us that we're stupid for believing in a fake ballot, so there you have it: The above mock-up is not to be used for actual Oscar voting.] </p>
<p><a href="http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/oscars/the-brokeback-butterfly-ballot-159169.php" >http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/oscars/the-brokeback-butterfly-ballot-159169.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1433</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1433</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Spoiler question...&lt;/strong&gt;
Were other ballot pages designed the same?
Outside of Crash, other winners were as expected (Best Actor/Actress, technical winners, etc.). Wouldn't a confusing ballot design cause more than one upset?

Though I was very disappointed BBM didn't win, I think this particular conspiracy theory is a red herring. 

60% of the academy are actors associated with Hollywood, Crash was set in LA with a large, well-known ensemble cast of A-list actors plus a few "emerging" ones, its social commentary was overt; they voted for their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Spoiler question&#8230;</strong><br />
Were other ballot pages designed the same?<br />
Outside of Crash, other winners were as expected (Best Actor/Actress, technical winners, etc.). Wouldn&#8217;t a confusing ballot design cause more than one upset?</p>
<p>Though I was very disappointed BBM didn&#8217;t win, I think this particular conspiracy theory is a red herring. </p>
<p>60% of the academy are actors associated with Hollywood, Crash was set in LA with a large, well-known ensemble cast of A-list actors plus a few &#8220;emerging&#8221; ones, its social commentary was overt; they voted for their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christiana Talks About Stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1431</link>
		<dc:creator>Christiana Talks About Stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1431</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Crash stole the election!!!1! Um, I mean the Oscar!!!1!...&lt;/strong&gt;


See, this explains everything.


I propose that we impeach Paul Haggis....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Crash stole the election!!!1! Um, I mean the Oscar!!!1!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>See, this explains everything.</p>
<p>I propose that we impeach Paul Haggis&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iris</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>iris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>Brokeback Mountain is still the Best Picture
based on CREDIBLE Award-giving bodies.
And not in the Oscars where its shit-headed members 
let the nannies, driver and gardener to vote for the winner!!!
ABSOLUTELY two-thumbs DOWN!!!
BAD TASTE!!!
No one who has TASTE is stupid enough to let Crash win.
sorry OSCARS, bad job...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brokeback Mountain is still the Best Picture<br />
based on CREDIBLE Award-giving bodies.<br />
And not in the Oscars where its shit-headed members<br />
let the nannies, driver and gardener to vote for the winner!!!<br />
ABSOLUTELY two-thumbs DOWN!!!<br />
BAD TASTE!!!<br />
No one who has TASTE is stupid enough to let Crash win.<br />
sorry OSCARS, bad job&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iris</title>
		<link>http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator>iris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickstarr.com/2006/03/07/oscar-gate/#comment-1425</guid>
		<description>Brokeback Mountain is still the best.
There are more Crash haters than those who like it.
This is a BIG BULLSHIT!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brokeback Mountain is still the best.<br />
There are more Crash haters than those who like it.<br />
This is a BIG BULLSHIT!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
